Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeffrey Peoples's avatar

Jesus was a wannabe tyrant. He died, according to the gospels, because he believed Yahweh was going to either intervene or resurrect him and make him king of the world. He threatened his enemies with torture if they didn’t obey what he believed Yahweh’s commands were. In the parable of the goat and sheep, the goats are thrown into a fire. Torture of his enemies is a common theme with Jesus. The fact that he told his followers to “love their enemy” by praying for them is perverse, given that what one thing they would be ostensibly be praying for is their obedience to Jesus’s deity, lest they be tortured. From the gospels, Jesus may want his sheep to be pacifists, but he wasn’t. He rioted in a temple and used violence, which is what led to his arrest. And he constantly insinuated that horrific violence would be carried out by himself and the deity he believed in.

Jesus’ message of “love” was disingenuous at best, and self-destructive and evil at worst. He said “do not resist an evil person”. That might make sense in a world where there is a god that punishes people and takes care of justice, but in the actual world we live in, it is a recipe for political nihilism and enabling tyrants. He used language of slavery to describe the proper relationship to him and his deity. And that was echoed by Paul, where Christians are told to be obedient slaves to their masters and to obey whatever laws the government institutes. A lot of what is written about what Jesus said is incoherent nonsense or moral lunancy. Ink blots should not be revered as moral authorities.

Hanging out with “sinners” to convert them wasn’t just something that Jesus did. Attempting to get “sinners” to repent was common among rabbis and itinerants and philosophers before Jesus. John the Baptist, for example was doing that. Stoics were essentially doing that. The important thing isn’t hanging out with “sinners”, but what one thinks is “sinful” and what one thinks the consequence of the “sin” should be. Once a person declares something a sin, they have already judged it. I hang out with sinners quite often—for example I sometimes go to Christian bible readings. Christians sin for worshipping a psychotic fictional deity. But I don’t feel like they deserve to be tortured for it — like Jesus felt should happen to people who didn’t worship that deity. I just think they should stop it. No “punishment” deserved except my occasional disparagement. Jesus hated way more people than he loved. It doesn’t matter he used that word quite a lot anymore than the fact Mike Huckabee has or Jim Jones did. The fact that he conceived himself as exceptionally loving when he fantasized about torturing people who didn’t become his slave is simply more depraved.

Jesus wasn’t a “black sheep”—in fact he is quite literally referred to as the “lamb of god.” His greatest virtue according to Christian mythology is *obedience.* Christians are referred to as sheep. All followers of Yahweh are described as sheep. Not the black ones, the white ones. The highest “Judeo Christian”

value is obedience — which should be anathema to “black sheep” philosophy. *Blindly* following “commandments” is *obedience*. “Loving” Yahweh is equated with blind obedience. Paul boasts about being a slave to Jesus. Blind faith and obedience is a repeated theme in both the Tanakh and the New Testament. And Jesus is said to exemplify it more than anyone else. He was not a black sheep, he was just a sheep.

For anyone who is truly a “black sheep”, his message is poison. But among proud sheep, well it has proven to be one of the most popular.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?